ScoreApp scores them. typevoice actually hears them.

Let's be fair to ScoreApp first: it is a well-made lead generation tool. The scorecard quiz is a clever top-of-funnel device. People love finding out their score, they trade an email address for it, and the quiz warms them up before a sales conversation. If your problem is "not enough leads", a quiz funnel is a reasonable answer.

But notice who the score is for. In a quiz funnel, the score belongs to the respondent. It is the reward that makes them finish. And it is computed from which boxes they ticked, using weights the quiz author configured. That means it measures self-report, and self-report is free. Anyone can tick "budget: ready to invest" in half a second, whether or not it is true. A quiz score can tell you what someone wanted you to think.

TypeVoice's score points the other direction. It belongs to you, the owner, and the respondent never sees it. It is not computed from ticked boxes but from what a real person actually said out loud: whether they named their revenue, whether they confirmed a budget or deflected, whether there is a deadline behind "why now", whether the whole answer sounds like their situation or like a script. The AI writes out its reasoning next to every score, and the raw recording is always one click away so your ears get the final vote.

The deeper difference is the moment each tool serves. ScoreApp works at the top of the funnel, where you want volume and low friction. TypeVoice works at the moment of decision, where volume is the problem: forty applications, one evening, and you need to know which three deserve a call. Ticked boxes cannot carry that decision. A voice can.

Some teams will use both, a quiz to attract and a voice application to qualify. But if you are choosing one tool to tell you who is serious, choose the one that listens.